I'm sorry to be "a voice of negativity" (as one major ocean conservationist recently called me) in all this, but I'm about to stick my neck out on the intelligent design-evolution controversy with a documentary feature film so I have little respect for those who are afraid to go near conflict. But more importantly, WHY aren't all the ocean conservation groups, with their multi-million dollar budgets, playing a major role in the debate over how to recover from Hurricane Katrina?
In today's NY Times is a big article about the debate over whether to rebuild in the wetlands or hand them back to nature. But you won't find a single mention of any conservation group in the article. There ought to be a very loud voice coming from ocean conservation groups supporting the latter option (restoring wetlands)-- they ought to be down there educating the public and government agencies about the need for healthy wetlands. They have so much resources for public education. I just don't understand why they don't engage in this and play a leadership role.
Sorry. I just don't get it. Is it a lack of flexibility and spontaneity -- i.e. a natural disaster doesn't fit into the ten year plan? And its no good to talk about all that the groups may be doing "behind the scenes" -- the fact is they are playing no role in communicating this issue to the public. They should be.
Making wetlands into wet lands in Louisiana